Fantasy: Time Cat

Apologies for formatting errors that I can’t seem to fix in this post.

Lloyd Alexander’s first novel for children is a tour guide of slightly cat-centric history and a promise of things to come. This bibliography is going to be fun.

See the source imageTitle: Time Cat
Author: Lloyd Alexander (1924-2007)
Original Publication Date: 1963
Edition: Puffin Books (1996), 206 pages
Genre: Fantasy. Historical Fiction.
Ages: 7-10
First Line: Gareth was a black cat with orange eyes.

A somewhat immature boy named Jason is sulking in his room after a bad day when his cat Gareth decides to speak to him. Jason (whose last name is never given, but I expect it’s probably Little) accepts this easily enough – Jason had always been sure he could if he wanted to and it’s left at that. However, he is surprised when Gareth shares a feline secret with him: cats don’t have nine lives, but they can visit nine lives, and Gareth has only been waiting for an “important reason” to do so. Jason gets to come along on a trip from Ancient Egypt to the American Revolution, learning about cats, people and life along the way.

Time Cat is a fairly perfect independent read for kids who are ready to tackle books without any illustrations. It’s a good standalone tale with adventure, humour and a cool premise: when cats disappear from a room they have actually gone time traveling. Short segments sustain the action, an occasional slimy villain pops up to threaten Jason and the situations he lands in are different enough from one to the next that any child should be fully entertained. Incidentally being introduced to the writing of Lloyd Alexander is just a bonus for down the road. Of course, Time Cat‘s very excellence for young kids dooms it to a fairly short shelf life, as it is so broadly sketched as to be soon outgrown in favor of deeper fantasy and historical narratives. That’s as it should be and it is certainly worth all 100+ Magic Treehouse books, and will do far more good for a child’s vocabulary, imagination and shelf space. To give an example: in Italy, 1468, Jason meets a boy called Leonardo (hint, hint) who shows him his room – the sort most scientifically-minded boys have probably wanted at one time or another.

Inside, Jason looked with amazement–tables crowded with piles of paper; collections of butterflies, rocks, pressed flowers. A squirrel raced back and forth in a small cage. In another cage, a sleepy green snake lay coiled. Great bottles and jars held clumps of moss and long-tailed, speckled lizards. From another bottle, a few fish stared at the inquisitive Gareth.
On a table, Leonardo had set a water bottle over a candle flame. “Did you ever notice how the bubbles come up?” Leonardo asked. “I’ve been watching them. There must be something inside, something invisible–I don’t know what it is. Perhaps the philosophers in Florence know and some day I’ll ask them. First, I want to try to find out for myself.”

https://www.johnnytimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/a-cat-by-leonardo-da-vinci.jpg
Detail from Cats in Motion, 1513-16 pen-and-ink by Italian artist Leonardo Da Vinci.

A quick rundown of places visited: The obvious cliche and weakest segment in ancient Egypt where cats are worshipped as gods; time spent tramping with the Roman legionaries before getting captured by some agreeable Britons; meeting a medieval Irish princess (with red-gold hair and a penchant for chatter, by the way) and a dignified slave by name of Sucat; teaching Japanese boy-Emperor Ichigo to stand up to his Regent, Uncle Fujiwara; meeting young Leonardo Da Vinci in Italy as he tries to convince his father that he’s an artist, not a notary; hanging out in post-Pizarro Peru; greeting the original Manx cat as she washes ashore on the Isle of Man; trying to avoid a nasty death in witch-burning Germany; and finally taking the rural tour of America in 1775.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7d/Manx_by_Gambier_Bolton.JPG
A historical photo of a Manx cat by photographer Gambier Bolton.

Almost every segment is two chapters long and everywhere they go Gareth imparts some fortune cookie wisdom like “even a kitten knows if you wait long enough someone’s bound to open the door.” Jason isn’t very proactive on their journey – whatever age he is, it’s apparently too young for active military service. Instead, he observes people and learns about life from them, to return home a steadier and wiser boy. Fantasy novels have a natural aspect of initiation and this one is no different, as Gareth points out at the end that he took Jason with to help him grow. There’s even a (very mild) sacrifice come journey’s end before Jason returns home in a cross between the movie version of The Wizard of Oz and Where the Wild Things Are.

 

Time Cat was Lloyd Alexander’s first novel for children after a string of flops, including a translation of Sartre’s La Nausée, which got roasted (along with Nausea itself) by Vladimir Nabokov. The moral: aim high and at least the giants themselves shall smite you. Alexander finally changed gears as he neared forty, and later described writing Time Cat as “the most creative and liberating experience of my life.” There’s a real joy that comes through the book, as it’s so clear that Alexander was simply enjoying the freedom of his new path in life. He loved cats, so they feature prominently. His villains are an entertaining series of oily and absurd caricatures, with the German witch-judge a standout:

 

The eldest judge, a bony, black-robed man with a lantern jaw and eyes as sharp as thorns, shuffled through some parchment sheets on the table. “We have studied your cases thoroughly,” he began, licking his lips, as if tasting every word.
“You’ve had no time to study anything,” shouted the miller.
The judge paid no attention. His little eyes turned sharper than ever as he read from his parchments.
“The accused witch, Johannes the miller: guilty.”
“The accused witch, Ursulina: guilty.”
“The accused witch, Master Speckfresser: guilty.”
“One demon disguised as a boy disguised as a demon: guilty.”
“One demon disguised as a cat: guilty.”
The judge set down his papers. “You will be burned at the stake in the morning. Believe me,” he added with a smile, “this is all for your own good.”

https://thewesterncornerofthecastle.home.blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/dda3e-lloyd2balexander.jpg
Lloyd Alexander.

Alexander’s writing is comfortable and witty, although it’s not quite polished enough to qualify as a great read-aloud on this early outing. He tosses around historic images like favorite toys, expecting kids to grasp the concept of centurions and Imperial Obeisance through context, rather than interrupting the plot to explain different factoids. Because of this it’s very light on educational material compared with more modern historical fiction for the same age group, and it has recently received some pointless criticism for cultural stereotyping. Honestly though, it’s for eight year olds. Try capturing a child’s imagination by explaining how the Incas were “exactly like you and me,” and see how much they remember about the subject in a month. We always begin with the broadest stereotypes, gaining detail and nuance as we grow up – so the Incas are memorable because they have llamas, while the Egyptians worship cats and ancient Britons wave spears around. Such details are memorable and interesting to a young child, and then swiftly outgrown as their reading naturally progresses.

Time Cat is simply a delightful experience at the right age. I read it avidly at around nine or so, and then within a couple of years I had moved on to Alexander’s far more mysterious Rope Trick. It’s easy to recommend and, while I don’t know exactly how consistent a writer Lloyd Alexander was over his long career, I’m looking forward to finding out.

 

https://i0.wp.com/img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110830042922/lloydalexander/images/3/3e/Time-Cat.jpg
My original copy of the book.

The Parental Guide up next, with some spoilers as always.

Violence: Death hangs over Jason’s head multiple times, including three threats of getting burned alive, but he never sustains any injury and after the danger is brought up it’s always swiftly negated. There are no other casualties until the final segment, when the likable Professor Parker is hit by British fire, though it’s never clear if he dies, since this is all we get: He smiled and tried to pull a shilling out of Jason’s ear, but his hand went slack and the coin dropped to the earth.

It is mentioned that cats are regularly killed in 1600 Germany, but none of the animal characters in the book suffer any harm. If you’re wondering, the “sacrifice” I mentioned Jason makes upon returning home is that Gareth will no longer be able to speak to him, but they will still understand one another without words.

Values: Sucat in the Ireland segment has a secular role, but it is revealed in a rather solemn moment at the end that Jason has actually just met Saint Patrick.

Cats are life’s great treasure, and this is not the last time Alexander would write a supremely cat-centric fantasy. In fact, it ends up such a trademark of his that I’m fairly surprised he kicked off his Prydain Chronicles with the hunt for an oracular animal of the porcine persuasion.

Monarchy is a fairly suspect arrangement in Time Cat, with rulers in general portrayed as ridiculously isolated from their subjects.

During the quiet story on the Isle of Man, Gareth states that everyone is pretty if they have pride in themselves, demonstrated by Dulcinea the Manx cat who doesn’t envy Gareth his tail. He also states the theme of Alexander’s career heretofore: “Trying to make someone do what they aren’t really good at is foolish.”

The most eye-rolling bit is easily when Sayri Tupac the Great Inca lets Jason and Gareth (being held for ransom) go because Don Diego the Spaniard gives a mushy speech about peace and understanding between cultures. “Understanding is better than gold,” says Sayri Tupac. Well, it was the sixties…

Role Models: Jason is a completely bland character; while he improves on his journey, it’s mostly by observing other, more interesting people. Gareth is a better creation, wise and unflappable, and when it’s time to save the princess, it’s Gareth who battles and slays the threatening serpent.

Educational Properties: The historical sketches are very light on detail, so even though you could tie the characters of Ichigo and Uncle Fujiwara to their real counterparts, it really belongs in the entertainment and fluency pile.

End of Guide.

Alexander’s books appear with some frequency at my local used bookstore, and I will be acquiring them whenever I can. As always, I invite those who’ve read more of his work than I have to share their opinions.

Up Next: Going for a classic western, and an example of what young adults were probably reading in the 1940s.

Coming-of-Age Stories: Anne of Avonlea

A lovely follow-up to a great classic that stays true to the characters and doesn’t manufacture drama to keep their lives interesting – preferring to develop new characters for that purpose. Don’t miss it.

https://thewesterncornerofthecastle.home.blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/db407-anneofavonlea.jpgTitle: Anne of Avonlea (Anne Novels #2)
Author: L.M. Montgomery (1874-1942)
Original Publication Date: 1909
Edition: Bantam Books (1998), 276 pages
Genre: Coming-of-Age.
Ages: 10-16
First Line: A tall, slim girl, “half-past sixteen,” with serious gray eyes and hair which her friends called auburn, had sat down on the broad red sandstone doorstep of a Prince Edward Island farmhouse one ripe afternoon in August, firmly resolved to construe so many lines of Virgil.

The immediate success of Anne of Green Gables inspired L.M. Montgomery to the swift production of a sequel, published the following year, and taking up almost immediately where the previous installment ended. Anne Shirley, having given up on college to help Marilla, finds joy and purpose in her newly public role in Avonlea, both as the new schoolteacher and as head of the Avonlea Village Improvement Society. Two new orphans are brought to Green Gables, she befriends Avonlea’s most reclusive spinster and, still being Anne, gets into a new series of absurd predicaments as she matures and finds that her path not taken may yet meet up on the road ahead. Yet again, the pacing is episodic and I must warn you that readers holding out for the famed Anne/Gilbert romance will find L.M. Montgomery cruelly indifferent to their wishes, for that major subplot from volume one is almost wholly absent here.

Anne of Avonlea is a slow, comfortable book. Odd as it is to associate Anne of Green Gables with drama and uncertainty, in hindsight this was certainly the case. Anne as a newcomer was never wholly secure and questions, such as whether Marilla would let her stay or whether the Barrys would allow her and Diana to remain friends, gave the novel some stake. In the sequel Anne knows her place and has a teenager’s insufferable certainty of right and wrong. She takes up teaching with ease and she sails into whatever task is at hand full of fresh theories and ideals. This self-confidence becomes something of a plot point in itself, for in the first hundred pages Anne almost loses herself in her new calling as Avonlea’s saintly beautician.

https://i0.wp.com/digital.library.upenn.edu/women/garvin/poets/montgomery.gif
Lucy Maud Montgomery.

Luckily, Montgomery was not blind to her heroine’s foibles and set her a losing battle with human nature in her efforts to win over sullen student Anthony Pye with a simpering “kill him with kindness” approach. The resolution to their battle of wills could not be rendered today with our changed views on corporal punishment but the messy human dynamic is inspired, as Anne betrays her ideals in a fit of pique while the boy responds respectfully to a display of power – because that is what he understands and respects, not an artificial kindness. The next morning finds Anne heartily ashamed of herself, when she runs into Anthony, who to her bewilderment tips his hat and carries her books to school. Anthony walked on in silence to the school, but when Anne took her books she smiled down at him … not the stereotyped “kind” smile she had so persistently assumed for his benefit but a sudden outflashing of good comradeship. Anthony smiled … no, if the truth must be told, Anthony grinned back. A grin is not generally supposed to be a respectful thing; yet Anne suddenly felt that if she had not yet won Anthony’s liking, she had, somehow or other, won his respect.

Elsewhere, Marilla’s decision to adopt a local pair orphan leads to the saga of Davy and Dora, six year old twins who luckily don’t upstage Marilla – she is given plenty of opportunities to be her wonderfully pessimistic self, perhaps even more so than in the first volume owing to Anne having rendered her virtually shock-proof. With Anne despondent after a hoped-for guest fails to appear, Marilla’s response is perfectly in keeping: “You’ll probably have a good many more and worse disappointments than that before you get through life,” said Marilla, who honestly thought she was making a comforting speech. The twins provide fresh havoc for Green Gables as Marilla quickly discovers that a six year old boy is a wholly different creature from an eleven year old girl – Dora, a prim, quiet child, ends up being little heeded while Davy monopolizes the attention of the women, and they play favorites to an extent that actually made me feel bad for Dora.

“Marilla, it may be a dreadful thing to say, but honestly, I like Davy better than Dora, for all she’s so good.”
“I don’t know but that I do, myself,” confessed Marilla, “and it isn’t fair, for Dora isn’t a bit of trouble. There couldn’t be a better child and you’d hardly know she was in the house.”
“Dora is too good,” said Anne. “She’d behave just as well if there wasn’t a soul to tell her what to do. She was born already brought up, so she doesn’t need us; and I think,” concluded Anne, hitting on a very vital truth, “that we always love best the people who need us. Davy needs us badly.”

https://i0.wp.com/great-authors.albertarose.org/mark_twain/novels/the_adventures_of_tom_sawyer/images/01-019.jpg
Tom Sawyer stealing, could not discover the illustrator.

Later on, Davy does improve, though he always reads like a cross between Tom Sawyer and that blonde boy from The Family Circus. First he steals from the jam jar and then, after learning it’s wrong to steal jam, he claims that there will at least be plenty of jam in heaven by quoting the catechism. “Why should we love God? It says, ‘Because he makes preserves and redeems us.’ You either find him adorably funny or you don’t. I vacillated on the question of Davy but I have to admit his request for a bedtime story made me laugh:

“I don’t want a fairy story. They’re all right for girls, I s’pose, but I want something exciting … lots of killing and shooting in it, and a house on fire, and in’trusting things like that.
Fortunately for Anne, Marilla called out at this moment from her room.

https://i0.wp.com/www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/brock/2.jpg
Miss Havisham and Estella, pen and ink illustration by H.M. Brock.

Otherwise, there are comedic interludes every bit as good as those found in the first volume, with the saga of Mr. Harrison’s cow particularly funny – and of course, no matter what calamities befall her, Anne always makes friends and mends fences. Even Avonlea’s answer to Miss Havisham, complete with a strange little girl always in tow, turns out to be sweet Miss Lavendar, an eccentric old dear who prefers to playact the life that passed her by than to groom little Charlotta the Fourth to avenge herself upon the male sex. After an episodic structure, Miss Lavendar’s story takes up much of the final third, and Montgomery delivers a much purer happy ending than she did in the previous volume.

There is an infectious warmth to her writing that is transmitted, however briefly, to the modern reader and renders the world brighter and more poetic for a time. Seen through Anne’s eyes, the mundane becomes wondrous. I remember the balm that Elizabeth Goudge brought me as a troubled 17 year old and the same traits are found in Montgomery’s world. Avonlea is too good to be true but it is a sustaining myth for the world that we have to live in, right at the age when children are beginning to realize what hardship that world entails. Anne has an instinctive sense for what is noble and good, even in the midst of the most frivolous debate:

“I think her parents gave her the only right and fitting name that could possibly be given her,” said Anne. “If they had been so blind as to name her Elizabeth or Nellie or Muriel she must have been called Lavendar just the same, I think. It’s so suggestive of sweetness and old-fashioned graces and ‘silk attire.’ Now, my name just smacks of bread and butter, patchwork and chores.”
“Oh, I don’t think so,” said Diana. “Anne seems to me real stately and like a queen. But I’d like Kerrenhappuch if it happened to be your name. I think people make their names nice or ugly just by what they are themselves. I can’t bear Josie or Gertie for names now but before I knew the Pye girls I thought them real pretty.”
“That’s a lovely idea, Diana,” said Anne enthusiastically. “Living so that you beautify your name, even if it wasn’t beautiful to begin with … making it stand in people’s thoughts for something so lovely and pleasant that they never think of it by itself. Thank you, Diana.”

See the source image
Job and his Daughters, 1825 engraving by English artist William Blake. The daughters are Jemima, Keziah and Kerrenhappuch.

Anne of Avonlea is a sweet and worthy sequel, growing its heroine and the landscape of Avonlea. It is lighter and more leisurely, yet the charms of the original remain and if you and your children loved Anne of Green Gables you needn’t fear disappointment here. Some children’s classics are followed by deeply inferior products but for her first sequel L.M. Montgomery had no need to manufacture scenarios, as Anne grows into her adopted community and approaches the bend in the road that will take her from girl to young woman with customary optimism. We can only follow after in similar spirit to volume three.

Parental Guide.

Violence: Anne whips and wins her most rebellious student. There’s a violent hailstorm with stones, the smallest of which was as big as a hen’s egg. A neighbour’s parrot dies during the storm and there’s a short scene of the man sitting sorrowfully by his lost companion.

Davy locks Dora in a neighbour’s tool shed for hours to give the women a scare and receives a pitifully slight punishment in response. Anne is actually far more upset that Davy lied about not knowing his sister’s whereabouts than she is that he locked her up to torment them all in the first place.

Values: Contentedness. None of that ‘Road Not Taken’ torment for Anne Shirley. She finds meaning in her relationships and her humble role as village schoolmistress, rather than constantly fretting over what could have been.

Anne and her friends fight staunchly to keep their town lovely, and while some efforts backfire, they do encourage a general move toward landscaping and keep the dread pharmaceutical advertisements off of their roads.

Disapproval is registered toward girls too obsessed with beaus – Anne and Diana fall out with a friend over her immodest and gloating behaviour. Anne, who is completely oblivious to love, is allowed to remain so, and people actually take care not to push the subject – even though most of Avonlea expects her to marry Gilbert Blythe when she does wise up. Mrs. Allan the minister’s wife stops short when about to prod Anne on the topic of Gilbert. In the delicate, whitebrowed face beside her, with its candid eyes and mobile features, there was still far more of the child than of the woman. Anne’s heart so far harbored only dreams of friendship and ambition, and Mrs. Allan did not wish to brush the bloom from her sweet unconsciousness. So she left her sentence for the future years to finish. Innocence respected, not trampled on from every angle.

Role Models: Anne remains a lovely example, of course, and as a completed young person there is less emphasis on her learning from others than before. Gilbert meanwhile decides to become a doctor: “The folks who lived before me have done so much for me that I want to show my gratitude by doing something for the folks who will live after me. It seems to me that is the only way a fellow can get square with his obligations to the race.”

Diana is a loyal friend. Anne is a red-hot Conservative, out of loyalty to Matthew’s memory and Diana’s father was a Liberal, for which reason she and Anne never discussed politics. In fact, all their differences in outlook and imagination do nothing to impede their loyalty to one another.

Educational Properties: Because Anne of Avonlea is a somewhat more prosaic work than the first, it would feels less like a killjoy for a parent to make use of it in exploring early 20th Century Canadian society of the science of storm systems. However, it still makes the most sense as sheer entertainment.

End of Guide.

I’ll be moving on to volume three, where Anne moves away to attend college, in a month or so. In the meantime…

Up Next: Getting started on the enormous bibliography of Lloyd Alexander with an early standalone novel.

Realistic Fiction: The Hundred Dresses

A tidy package of 79 pages of psychological accuracy that I suspect is wasted on grade schoolers.

https://i0.wp.com/resource.scholastic.com.au/ProductImages/7907633_Z.jpgTitle: The Hundred Dresses
Author: Eleanor Estes (1906-1988)
Illustrator: Louis Slobodkin (1903-1975)
Original Publication Date: 1944
Edition: Scholastic Inc. (unknown year), 79 pages
Genre: Realistic Fiction.
Ages: 5-8
First Sentence: Today, Monday, Wanda Petronski was not in her seat.

Every morning, the girls in the class of Room 13 mill outside talking about dresses, specifically the hundred dresses Wanda Petronski claims to have. Wanda, a Polish girl, wears the same faded dress every day, and all the girls find her claim extremely funny, with popular Peggy going out of her way to question her on the matter. Peggy’s best friend Maddie feels awkward but goes along with the game – until the Petronskis move away and she regrets her silence. However, it turns out there was a lot more to Wanda than met the eye and Maddie wonders how she and Peggy can ever make amends.

https://i0.wp.com/pics.cdn.librarything.com/picsizes/cb/50/cb50dbae378ab98636d4d5241674331414f6744.jpg
Eleanor Estes.

Eleanor Estes based this brief story on childhood recollections of a girl in her classroom. She grew up in New Haven, Connecticut and the girl had a strange sounding name, wore shabby clothes, and was ill-treated by classmates. Estes wrote The Hundred Dresses to address the situation and it has remained her most popular work; it is also an early example of an “issues novel” (yes, this seems to be the official phrase) on the subject of bullying. I acquired the book in first grade, the very year I was being bullied and I read it several times with no adult input. I did not even recognise what Peggy and company were doing as bullying Wanda, and the intended message made a soft whooshing noise as it went over my head. Still, I read it many times because I loved Wanda Petronski. Her home on Boggins Heights sounded like paradise to a reluctant city girl like me, and “pretending to walk to Wanda’s house” became a standard backyard game for the rest of that friendless school year.

I bring this reaction up to demonstrate the problem I have with “issues novels.” I didn’t care about Maddie or her remorse and didn’t connect this story with anything that was happening in my life. I just liked Wanda. Of course other kids could respond differently, but I wonder how much time teachers/parents spend leading their charges to the “correct” response. This somewhat misses the point, because The Hundred Dresses is not at all didactic.

hundred dresses eleanor estes louis slobodkin
Illustration by Louis Slobodkin.

For one thing, the structure is surprisingly sophisticated for first graders, as Wanda only ever appears in flashback – adding an extra layer of poignancy to the text, as by the opening line she’s already gone. It also appeared almost like a conjuring trick to my young self as it dawned on me that she never actually appeared in a story which was all about her.

Estes has a very simple prose style that nevertheless contains many telling details, establishing “the facts” in the Petronski case in the exact way a child would, with Wanda relegated to a portion of the scenery that never quite matches the rest:

Usually Wanda sat in the next to the last seat in the last row in Room 13. She sat in the corner of the room where the rough boys who did not make good marks on their report cards sat; the corner of the room where there was the most scuffling of feet, most roars of laughter when anything funny was said, and most mud and dirt on the floor.
Wanda did not sit there because she was rough and noisy. On the contrary she was very quiet and rarely said anything at all. And nobody had ever heard her laugh out loud. Sometimes she twisted her mouth into a crooked sort of smile, but that was all.
Nobody knew exactly why Wanda sat in that seat unless it was because she came all the way from Boggins Heights, and her feet were usually caked with dry mud that she picked up coming down the country roads. Maybe the teacher liked to keep all the children who were apt to come in with dirty shoes in one corner of the room. But no one really thought much about Wanda Petronski once she was in the classroom.

hundred dresses empty seat
Wanda’s empty desk…

The poignant qualities of prose and tale are aided by Louis Slobodkin’s accompanying illustrations, which can be haunting in places. He often worked with Estes, having illustrated her three previous Moffat novels, the last two of which won Newbery Honors, making The Hundred Dresses her third consecutive win. I’m not a big fan of his half-finished style, but it does suit the brevity of this tale.

Maddie’s psychology is also remarkably nuanced. Much is made of her epiphany that she was never going to stand by and say nothing again; however, for the remainder of the novel we never actually see her make good on her vow to speak up. Instead, what we see is Maddie putting herself to sleep at night making speeches about Wanda, defending her from great crowds of girls who were trying to tease her with, “How many dresses have you got?” Before Wanda could press her lips together in a tight line the way she did before answering, Maddie would cry out, “Stop! This girl is just a girl just like you are….” And then everybody would feel ashamed, the way she used to feel. Sometimes she rescued Wanda from a sinking ship or the hoofs of a runaway horse. “Oh, that’s all right,” she’d say when Wanda thanked her with dull, pained eyes.

Maddie casts Wanda as a perpetual victim in a play with herself as the heroine. But it is Wanda who is the heroine of this book, as she draws her hundred dresses, wins the school drawing contest with them and, in her eventual letter to Room 13, behaves with complete magnanimity to her former classmates: Please tell the girls they can keep those hundred dresses because in my new house I have a hundred new ones all lined up in my closet.

hundred dresses Peggy and Wanda
Peggy and Wanda.

When we look at Peggy, we see that, to all appearances, she is indifferent to the pain she caused Wanda; yet it is she, not Maddie, who instigates their trip to Boggins Heights and it is she who plucks up courage to ask the neighbour “When did the Petronskis move?” When she’s done all she can to make amends with Wanda, she moves on with her life untroubled – and given Wanda’s behaviour, it’s quite possible that Peggy’s read on the Polish girl is far more accurate than Maddie’s guilt-ridden visions. “Besides, when I was asking her about all of her dresses she probably was getting good ideas for her drawings. She might not even have won the contest otherwise.” Peggy, for all her self-centered ways, at least grants Wanda some autonomy.

However, all of this will probably pass right over the heads of young children. I love that Eleanor Estes didn’t patronize or pander but I also think this is a book that takes growing into, more likely to be loved by children once they’re adults looking back. While it is written with understanding and compassion toward all three girls, it is by no means as didactic as educators seem to think it is, and that’s where its long-term value comes from. The Hundred Dresses is well worth the Honor it received.

Parental Guide.

Violence: The most genteel and picturesque portrait of bullying you are ever likely to come across.

Values: The message of compassion and awareness seems tailored to the Maddies and Peggys of the schoolyard, not the Wandas. There’s no actual insistence that they should have “included” Wanda more; the girls should rather have given Wanda’s situation some consideration and refrained from personal remarks. They knew she didn’t have any mother, but they hadn’t thought about it. They hadn’t thought she had to do her own washing and ironing. She only had one dress and she must have had to wash and iron it overnight. Maybe sometimes it wasn’t dry when it was time to put it on in the morning. But it was always clean.

The small town society is treated in a fairly neutral manner rather than a haven of small-minded bigotry. The teacher is saddened by the departure of the Petronskis, and the children are completely silent when she reads letters from Wanda and her father. The impression is less of deliberate malice and more of simple thoughtlessness.

Role Models: Wanda is a paragon of virtue – she’s artistic and dedicated, but also patient and forgiving. Maddie’s new outlook might seem nice, but she’s a satellite, while I maintain that Peggy is actually better at getting things done and therefore more worthy of emulation.

hundred dresses umbrella
Walking to school.

Educational Properties: The class of Room 13 recites the Gettysburg Address at the start of every day and later they learn about Winfield Scott. A little background on Polish immigrants might be a way to add context to Wanda’s story, but I would save details on what was happening to Poland while Estes was writing about this sympathetic little girl for when your children are older.

Because of The Hundred Dresses‘ brevity and structure, I think it could be a useful tool to demonstrate some of the rules of composition, always provided your student/child is invested in Wanda’s plight to start with. Any book can be used to practice writing, creative or not, but I suppose this one might make a more tempting target with all of its ethical elements.

End of Guide.

I am now keen as mustard to get more of Estes’ works, even though my chief memory of Ginger Pye is of not finishing it. Let me know your thoughts on Eleanor Estes and The Hundred Dresses.

Up Next: Anne Shirley finds gainful employment in L.M. Montgomery’s first sequel.

Anthropomorphic Fantasy: Stuart Little

This classic holds the dubious distinction of being the first book I ever read that left me feeling cheated of a justly-deserved ending, and I suspect this milestone applies to a lot of other children as well. Yet in hindsight this might even be the thing I appreciate most about the book…

book stuart little coverTitle: Stuart Little
Author: E.B. White (1899-1985)
Illustrator: Garth Williams (1912-1996)
Original Publication Date: 1945
Edition: Scholastic Inc. (1987), 131 pages
Genre: Anthropomorphic fantasy.
Ages: 5-8
First Sentence: When Mrs. Frederick C. Little’s second son arrived, everybody noticed that he was not much bigger than a mouse.

Stuart Little is a mouse born into a human family, an unexpected event that the Littles (and the world) accept with enviable equanimity. Small as he is, any number of misadventures can befall Stuart around the house, but he, his parents and older brother George muddle through, until the arrival of the bird Margalo – a sweet-tempered creature that Stuart quickly falls for. Snowbell, the family cat, is not so pleased, and puts out a hit on the bird, courtesy of a femme fatale feline known only as the Angora (if you haven’t read this book, please be aware I am dramatizing a little here). Margalo gets wind of the plot and flees without saying goodbye to the Littles. Stuart, distraught, decides to head out after her.

book stuart faucet garth williams
Illustration by Garth Williams.

Stuart Little is like two books in one. The first half, consisting of Stuart’s home life, is as perfect a children’s tale as you’re likely to find, effortlessly appealing to the imaginations of those still young enough to be preoccupied with truly important matters – such as what it would be like to be about two inches tall and have to make your way across the house. The second half contains almost nothing which would appeal to the same child at the same age. Instead, Stuart leaves home without a goodbye, takes a job pontificating to a bunch of schoolchildren, gets a date with a human girl who’s just his size, makes a complete mess out of it and gets back on the road, still looking for his bird and without the slightest proof that he’ll ever find her. I find that the only way this complete collapse of momentum and humour makes any sense (and I have no proof of this theory) is if E.B. White took a break and, when he came back, decided to send-up The Great American Novel that a hundred Thomas Wolfe wannabes were busy flooding the market with. This is the only way that Stuart Little’s prosey travelogue of impractical politics and girl troubles can be explained to my satisfaction, anyway. Let me know your theory.

This might be a fatal flaw in a lesser novel, rendering it nothing but a historical curio, but Stuart Little has so much to offer in the first half that it remains a children’s classic to this day. What sets it apart from other mouse tales is White’s wonderful style, which is balanced perfectly between the simplicity that would allow a child to handle it on his own and a verve that makes it a comfortable read-aloud for a parent. White’s manner is warm, wry and elegant, even when the hero is in imminent danger of an undignified death:

One day when he was seven years old, Stuart was in the kitchen watching his mother make tapioca pudding. He was feeling hungry, and when Mrs. Little opened the door of the electric refrigerator to get something, Stuart slipped inside to see if he could find a piece of cheese. He supposed, of course, his mother had seen him, and when the door swung shut and he realized he was locked in, it surprised him greatly.
“Help!” he called. “It’s dark in here! It’s cold in this refrigerator. Help! Let me out! I’m getting colder by the minute.”
But his voice was not strong enough to penetrate the thick wall. In the darkness he stumbled and fell into a saucer of prunes. The juice was cold. Stuart shivered, and his teeth chattered together. It wasn’t until half an hour later that Mrs. Little again opened the door and found him standing on a butter plate, beating his arms together to try to keep warm, and blowing on his hands, and hopping up and down.

book stuart in fridge garth williams
Waiting for rescue.

Stuart is a dapper mouse, with a complete dignity of dress and manner that allows him to feel bigger than his ridiculous circumstances. His request for a “nip of brandy” at the close of the fridge episode cements him as yet another adult protagonist in a story for children. However, I do wonder if the weakness of the second half might not be due to an absence of the other Littles, a flustered chorus to his misadventures and a loving family – even if they never do have the sense to board up the mousehole in the pantry. An example of their interplay from when they mistakenly believe Stuart has gone down it:

George was in favor of ripping up the pantry floor. He ran and got his hammer, his screw driver, and an ice pick.
“I’ll have this old floor up in double-quick time,” he said, inserting his screw driver under the edge of the first board and giving a good vigorous pry.
“We will not rip up this floor till we have had a good search,” announced Mr. Little. “That’s final, George! You can put that hammer away where you got it.”
“Oh, all right,” said George. “I see that nobody in this house cares anything about Stuart but me.”
Mrs. Little began to cry. “My poor dear little son!” she said. “I know he’ll get wedged somewhere.”
“Just because you can’t travel comfortably in a mousehole doesn’t mean that it isn’t a perfectly suitable place for Stuart,” said Mr. Little. “Just don’t get yourself all worked up.”

book stuart little margalo garth williams
A pretty little bird.

All together, including Snowbell, the Littles are a treat. It’s a perfect tale – a little strange, but humanoid mice are a strange concept when you think of it – until Margalo arrives and Stuart falls in love with a bird. Maybe this entire plot is purely to facilitate a pun – a “bird” is a girl, therefore a girl is a bird. However, it starts to feel more and more made up as it goes along. Stuart is too small to carry actual coin, so how does he pay for gasoline? Why does he have to chop down a dandelion for greens, yet is able to travel around with a mouse-sized tin of ham? Also, even as a child, it made no sense that Stuart, going on foot, would be able to find Margalo. Supposing she comes back while he’s out looking for her? I figured the likeliest way they’d meet again is if Margalo heard he was missing, and went looking for him.

The whole second half has a melancholy air. Stuart wrecks his new toy automobile in a sad and improbable bit of slapstick. He’s the world’s most boring substitute teacher, talking about being “Chairman of the World,” claiming that “rats are underprivileged,” and coming up with impracticable laws against being mean (this is the longest chapter in the whole book and has no pertinence on anything else). Meanwhile, the sudden appearance of Thumbelina Miss Ames is just bizarre, and Stuart behaves terribly the whole time he’s with her. Stuart, if you’re lonely for companionship, maybe try locating New York’s mouse population, who probably left you as a changeling in a human hospital to start with (this was always my theory anyway).

https://media1.britannica.com/eb-media/58/99358-004-8DF1F962.jpg
Elwyn Brooks White in the office.

This isn’t to say that the second half of Stuart Little has nothing to offer. White’s writing is consistent, there’s a wealth of local colour regarding 1940s New York, Garth Williams was already a quintessential children’s book illustrator on his very first try, and the non-ending is strangely inspired – especially since E.B. White is a rare example of a children’s author who did not weaken and knock out an inferior sequel when strapped for cash. It just ends. It is a messy novel meant for an age group that collects “practice” books which emphasize rigorous, multi-volume predictability, a la The Boxcar Children series. It is highly recommendable and artistically excellent, even if it does have the inescapable sense of a failed experiment. Just make sure your son or daughter gets Charlotte’s Web first, because Stuart Little is not necessarily the best introduction to E.B. White. Indeed, despite revisiting this (okay, the first half) often enough while growing up, I never trusted White enough to read a second one.

Parental Guide. Stuart’s letter to Miss Ames raised my eyebrows as I read it for this project. Quite frankly, he’s every parents’ nightmare: …my purpose in writing this brief note is to suggest that we meet. I realize that your parents may object to the suddenness and directness of my proposal, as well as to my somewhat mouselike appearance, so I think probably it might be a good idea if you just didn’t mention the matter to them. What they don’t won’t hurt them. He does promise to leave this matter to her own good judgement, and I suppose looked at from the Ames’ point of view the whole “afternoon on the river” sequence is a G rated cautionary tale about going on blind dates with hirsute strangers from out-of-town but it still feels tremendously out of place. Of course, Thumbelina herself was also courted by several wildly inappropriate suitors before finding her fairy prince, so maybe that’s what White was actually referring to here.

book stuart and miss ames garth williams
Stuart and Miss Harriet Ames.

Violence: Stuart gets into several close shaves, among them getting swept into a garbage truck and nearly drowned in the ocean. Snowbell and the Angora both threaten to eat Margalo, and Stuart defends her with a bow and arrow one night in a very Arthurian way. He destroys his toy car, though it’s fixed up again good as new.

Values: Chief among the values displayed here is actually stoicism. When Stuart boasts or brags he gets into trouble, first with the windowshade and then Miss Ames. When he does something truly noble, such as winning the boat race or saving Margalo, he is far too modest to tell anyone and the feat passes by unsung.

The Littles invent all manner of aids to help Stuart get about and enjoy life, while the dentist tinkers with model boats and cars. Stuart enjoys being useful to others and always has proper attire for every possible occasion. E.B. White also briefly morphs into his Elements of Style self, and has Stuart-as-teacher say “a misspelled word is an abomination in the sight of everyone. I consider it a very fine thing to spell words correctly and I strongly urge every one of you to buy a Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary and consult it whenever you are in the slightest doubt.”

You could try to read Stuart Little as a metaphor for a handicapped or adopted child, but I would advise against this search for deeper meaning, as Stuart never really fits in, although his parents love him very much. Indeed, life with the Littles is portrayed as far more of a struggle than his subsequent independent voyage, of which he is a fairly successful navigator. He also leaves home without a word – so as far as families in classic children’s books go, this one is more on the dysfunctional side.

Role Models: Stuart actually regresses over the course of his story, from a gallant young mouse to a petulant one. I think White intended the Miss Ames date to demonstrate the problem of letting a perfect day dream interfere with having an imperfectly good day, but it’s the penultimate chapter and leaves Stuart on a very downcast and immature note.

https://www.nccil.org/img/assets/img/portraits/2323/Garth-Williams-Portrait_e0fc7258c45b5e0ad8ee7dfed878bd55.jpg
Garth Williams.

Everyone, even the devious cats, are fully likable characters and most of them strive to be helpful at some point or other.

Educational Properties: Plenty of thought exercises and physics lessons. Random questions like “why doesn’t the story end? What do you think happened next? If a toy car is driving, is it still a mile?” spring to mind.

End of Guide.

Expect my review of Charlotte’s Web in August and The Trumpet of the Swan in September. E.B. White is going to be the first author on the Western Corner of the Castle whose bibliography I will be completing and I have absolutely no idea what to expect after this one. What are your thoughts on Stuart Little?

Up Next: One of the 1945 Newbery Honor books, so we’re almost staying in the year.