Mystery: Tom Sawyer, Detective

Mark Twain had many talents but Stratemeyer Syndication wasn’t one of them.

book tom sawyerTitle: Tom Sawyer, Detective
Author: Mark Twain (1835-1910)
Original Publication Date: 1896
Edition: The Complete Adventures of Tom Sawyer, Borders Classics (2006), 281 to 337 (56) of 337 pages.
Genre: Adventure. Mystery.
Ages: 11-13
First Sentence: Well, it was the next spring after me and Tom Sawyer set our old nigger Jim free the time he was chained up for a runaway slave down there on Tom’s Uncle Silas’s farm in Arkansaw.

Our scene opens upon a fairly decent description of spring fever on the parts of Tom and Huck, which leads immediately to an odd little passage as Huck details what thoughts this pent-up energy can lead to: …you want to go and be a wanderer; you want to go wandering far away to strange countries where everything is mysterious and wonderful and romantic. And if you can’t do that, you’ll put up with considerable less; you’ll go anywhere you can go, just so as to get away, and be thankful of the chance, too. This appears to be Twain’s way of saying the previous installment’s Arabian fantasia never happened, as the text otherwise refuses any acknowledgement of Tom Sawyer Abroad. Goodbye airship captain, hello Perry Mason.

https://tvguide1.cbsistatic.com/i/2019/03/22/6b96228a-1d98-4a52-aba1-1b70f3d8f4f9/7723ea02e4e58ff4fd479b156c8940ff/190322-raymond-burr-perry-mason.png
Raymond Burr is about to ruin some hoodlum’s day…

Also, goodbye Jim, who is nowhere to be found in this volume. It’s certainly more realistic than having him continue to be part of the gang, but a big part of the allure to sequels is in the audience’s desire to find out what happened to previous characters. Would it have killed Twain to insert one line of explanation? Jim headed north. Jim joined the Underground Railroad. Jim hopped a ship on route to Liberia. Something.

https://flaglerlive.com/wp-content/uploads/c42-355.jpg
Remember this scene, Aunt Sally?

This leaves Tom and Huck, bored and looking for adventure, when Tom’s Aunt Sally sends for them because Uncle Silas has been in an altercation with his neighbours, brothers Brace and Jubiter Dunlap. It’s not clear why Aunt Sally thinks that Tom and Huck will be an asset, a “comfort” in these hard times, considering their last visit included heavy gaslighting of both her and her husband, vandalism of house and property, inciting a mob to violence and getting Tom shot in the leg, but no matter. The boys head down on the riverboat and run into Jubiter’s identical twin, Jake Dunlap, who was presumed dead years ago and is now on the way home with a fortune in stolen diamonds and two angry ex-partners in hot pursuit. Everyone arrives in Arkansas and murder is the result. Tom Sawyer must take to the stand and defend his uncle to unveil the real murderer among them.

Since this is a mystery, I will do my best to avoid spoilers, just in case someone does intend to read this book.

As much trouble as I’ve had with the Tom Sawyer sequels thus far, there have always been praiseworthy elements, even in the dubious science fiction of Tom Sawyer Abroad. At that point it still felt like Mark Twain was enjoying some part of the money-grubbing process, as the book had glimmers of wit and elegant passages hidden away where you least expected them. However, in this final installment, all those better qualities have shrunk almost to nothing in a tale that seems to exist only for the entertainment of its closing chapter. Twain seems completely bored with proceedings, keeping Tom and Huck on a very tight leash until near the end, when Tom decides to borrow a neighbour’s bloodhound. Until that point they are simply observers of the action, unable to get into mischief because mischief would create subplots and this book was written to be published in a hurry – it’s the shortest in the series, 56 pages to Abroad‘s 80, and it feels it. In previous volumes, Tom and Huck’s intelligence levels have been on a dizzying see-saw, but this is the first time they’ve felt so tired as characters.

https://cdn.britannica.com/03/6703-004-A81DF9EE/Steen-Steensen-Blicher-detail-drawing-ink-pencil.jpg
Steen Steensen Blicher (1782-1848), one of Denmark’s great writers who remains little known internationally.

Tom Sawyer, Detective is a mystery, which is not a genre Twain was suited for. Incidentally, he was later accused of plagiarizing this plot from a Danish crime novella called The Vicar of Weilby (now more commonly translated as The Rector of Veilbye), written in 1829 by Steen Blicher and itself based on a true event from 1626. The two stories are admittedly quite similar, although the original Danish is way more depressing (big surprise). It doesn’t appear that a consensus has ever been reached on whether the allegation was true or not, and I couldn’t find any information outside of Wikipedia, so it does not appear to be a big source of debate at present. Let’s move on.

For the plot, Twain makes use of identical twins, a conceit he also engaged with in Pudd’nhead Wilson – the problem with bringing such a topic into a mystery setting is that readers know immediately that there will be a case of mistaken identity at some point. Meanwhile, Uncle Silas’s farm is clearly at the center of a mystical convergence, as once again a bunch of criminals all descend on the same stand of trees at the same time as Huck and Tom – it’s given a slightly more probable setup than it was in Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, but it certainly doesn’t make the already contrived plot feel any better. Then there’s the courtroom bit where Tom reveals the identity of an imposter because of a hand gesture he’d seen the man use before, and which the audience was never privy to in the first place. So the tale is at once predictable in its twists and impossible to “solve” alongside our erstwhile Perry Mason. All this on top of the problem that comes with Tom and Huck spending so much time watching and listening to other people rather than investigating. They spend four chapters thinking that their best clue is actually a supernatural occurrence, bogging the mystery down for the sake of a tired joke.

https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/media/220836/credit_john_leslie.jpg
A kennel club bloodhound trial.

There are a couple of rays of light in all of this. First there’s the adorable scene where the boys wander across the countryside with a happy bloodhound, corpse-hunting. It’s a cute mix of ghoulish proclivities with classic childhood revels, and features the boys being proactive even though they feel like idiots for trying:

It was a lovely dog. There ain’t any dog that’s got a lovelier disposition than a bloodhound, and this one knowed us and liked us. He capered and raced around ever so friendly, and powerful glad to be free and have a holiday; but Tom was so cut up he couldn’t take any intrust in him, and said he wished he’d stopped and thought a minute before he ever started on such a fool errand. He said old Jeff Hooker would tell everybody, and we’d never hear the last of it.
So we loafed along home down the back lanes, feeling pretty glum and not talking. When we was passing the far corner of our tobacker field we heard the dog set up a long howl in there, and we went to the place and he was scratching the ground with all his might, and every now and then canting up his head sideways and fetching another howl.
It was a long square, the shape of a grave; the rain had made it sink down and show the shape. The minute we come and stood there we looked at one another and never said a word. When the dog had dug down only a few inches he grabbed something and pulled it up, and it was an arm and a sleeve. Tom kind of gasped out, and says–
“Come away, Huck–it’s found.”

This is an effective little scene hidden away in the midst of the slow plot, and the other entertaining portion is saved for the final courtroom scene, in which Tom takes to the stand to reveal the dastardly truth about every crime, stringing out each revelation for “effect” and feeling more like himself again – a final farewell to the brash, theatrical know-it-all. Energized by the limelight, Tom solves the case and gets the reward money, with our last glimpse of the pair summing up their friendship and their finest qualities in a rather beautiful sendoff: And so the whole family was as happy as birds, and nobody could be gratefuler and lovinger than what they was to Tom Sawyer; and the same to me, though I hadn’t done nothing. And when the two thousand dollars come, Tom give half of it to me, and never told anybody so, which didn’t surprise me, because I knowed him.

It’s a worthy goodbye to humble Huck and his compatriot, and I felt appropriately wistful as I closed the omnibus – an impressive feat, considering what a slog I found this volume to be. Despite building on established characters and settings here, I actually much preferred the wild departure of Tom Sawyer Abroad, which had greater amounts of wit, imagery and bafflement, wrapped in a sci-fi expedition that gave it a vague sense of fun. Tom Sawyer, Detective just made me wonder if Mark Twain were depressed when he wrote it. While very young kids might find the plot more surprising than their parents, I can’t recommend it when such series as Nancy Drew are so easily available.

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2014/07/Twain_looking_out_a_window-1/lead_720_405.jpg?mod=1533691683
Mark Twain casting a cold eye on something.

To summarize my opinions on this series, there is sadly a good reason the last two volumes are so forgotten. They have not been unjustly spurned as I at first suspected, and even Twain’s use of the vernacular is far more sloppy than anything found in the truly perfectionist narrative he first gave Huck. When it comes down to it I would only recommend The Adventures of Tom Sawyer – a truly inspired and essential classic of children’s literature. Follow up with Adventures of Huckleberry Finn only if you’re studying the history of American literature, and the final two only from morbid curiosity. Reading all three sequels has not diminished the original though. Quite the opposite.

See Also: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer Abroad.

Parental Guide, with no spoilers.

Violence: It’s a murder mystery for kids. At some point, murder was struck from the list of appropriate mystery topics for juveniles and I’m not sure when it was added back into the mix (I’d suspect the 70s, and am genuinely curious to start collecting Edgar winners to find out). At any rate, the boys do witness a murder, in nowhere near the visceral detail of the bloody brawl in book one. There’s no way anyone who has already read The Adventures of Tom Sawyer would be bothered by anything in this book.

Values: The final passage seems to indicate that the best virtues in life are intelligence and humility, with Twain’s lack of satiric bite making it easier to get a read on such things…maybe.

Role Models: Tom and Huck are good kids, and even though they’re a bit tired on this outing, neither one feels like a caricature of their worst qualities. This is a nice note to go out on and is possibly the only reason this installment might be worth reading – although if you take my advice and skip all of the sequels, you’ll never have that problem in the first place.

Educational Properties: Nothing occurs to me.

End of Guide.

With that I conclude my first series for the WCC. From the start it wasn’t at all what I was expecting, but the complete Tom Sawyer was oddly endearing. As for Mark Twain, he only wrote one other novel that was intended for a juvenile audience – The Prince and the Pauper, which I have acquired a copy of and plan to review within the next few months.

Up Next: December, and to honor the Christmas spirit I will try to keep all reviews on books with a hopeful outlook (since I really don’t have enough Christmas-themed books for an entire month). So up next is Lloyd Alexander with a short novel in praise of the human condition.

Sentimental Fiction: Anne of Windy Poplars

Anne Shirley is now a guardian angel to all who cross her path and I have to create a new genre heading to contain this much glurge…

https://i0.wp.com/s3.foreveryoungadult.com.s3.amazonaws.com/_uploads/images/21034/anneofwindypoplars__span.jpgTitle: Anne of Windy Poplars (Anne Novels #4)
Author: L.M. Montgomery (1874-1942)
Original Publication Date: 1936
Edition: Bantam Books (1998), 258 pages
Genre: Sentimental Fiction. Romance.
Ages: 12-14
First Line: (Letter from Anne Shirley, B.A., Principal of Summerside High School, to Gilbert Blythe, medical student at Redmond College, Kingsport.)

Taking place over the course of three years while her fiance Gilbert is studying to be a doctor, Anne takes a new job as the principal of Summerside High School, where she embraces her new role with great enthusiasm despite the difficulties of being an outsider to the area. Soon enough she wins over even her fiercest critics and is comfortably ensconced as Summerside’s resident maiden aunt, meddling in the domestic and love lives of almost everyone who crosses her path.

The seventh Anne novel written, Windy Poplars is listed as fourth in chronological order and it changes the format slightly by alternating between the usual third-person narration and Anne’s letters to Gilbert. This sounds like an intriguing change of pace but the execution leaves something to be desired, as Gilbert’s replies to these letters are never shown, nor are her letters even rendered in their entirety, with any portions pertaining to Avonlea, family, former friends and her romance with Gilbert carefully excised. The chief pleasures of the epistolary format are thus absent. Sadly, that is not the only missed opportunity herein.

The novel begins in a fairly exciting fashion as, after introducing the latest set of old dears Anne will be staying with, it becomes clear that not everyone is happy to have her around – notably the local gentry, the Pringles. The entire clan is arrayed against her, down to the children and in-laws, and this makes it impossible for Anne to do her job or even maintain order in the classroom. This is an incredibly refreshing development and creates a situation of rapidly escalating unfairness. Anne finds it hard to maintain a hopeful outlook against such poor treatment that she did nothing to warrant and which none of the parents will lift a finger to check (and even encourage): “The Pringle situation grows a little more acute every week. Something very impertinent was written across one of my books yesterday and Homer Pringle turned handsprings all the way down the aisle when leaving school. Also, I got an anonymous letter recently full of nasty innuendoes. Somehow, I don’t blame Jen [Pringle] for either the book or the letter. Imp as she is, there are things she wouldn’t stoop to. Rebecca Dew is furious and I shudder to think what she would do to the Pringles if she had them in her power. Nero’s wish isn’t to be compared to it. I really don’t blame her, for there are times when I feel myself that I could cheerfully hand any and all of the Pringles a poisoned philter of Borgia brewing.”

Fresh possibilities arise from this storyline, as Anne has actual enemies to contend with. Will she win them over with a magnanimous gesture? Will she best a Pringle in some fashion that earns their grudging respect? Will her sheer tenacity win the day? So many options, with perhaps the Pringles even starting to split around the Anne issue as the novel wears on, and instead (mild spoilers) Montgomery resolves the whole conflict not even a quarter into the book when Anne accidentally (accidentally!) convinces the Pringles to call an end to the feud. From this point on Anne is back to being adored by all who know her – holdouts like her bitter coworker Katherine Brooke just need a little extra TLC before they too join the chorus of approbation: “In spite of my hatred there were times when I acknowledged to myself that you might just have come from some far-off star.” I have enjoyed Anne as a character to this point because she was never a Mary Sue – she had storms of feeling and got into predicaments, confronted life’s sorrow and made an effort to be better. Now she’s a perfect Pollyanna and the world around her feels manipulated rather than idyllic.

https://artdeco-fengshui.com/zen-shop/_media/img/medium/big-0-crbst-fee-etoiles-ellhea.jpg
That about sums it up. Painted by contemporary French artist Ellhea.

The sad thing is that Montgomery was previously able to write very charming novels about Anne that did not betray human nature (see the resolution to Anne’s clash with Anthony Pye, or for that matter her entire “Prince Charming” misstep). Now her heroine gushes about how “The Pringles are delightful people. How could I ever have compared them to the Pyes?” as if her tormentors were kindred spirits all along.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/LMM_signed_photo.jpg
Lucy Maud Montgomery.

Aside from the problem of Anne, Windy Poplars is styled as a collection of stories, with Anne making the acquaintance of a Summerside local and his or her especial problem before, in the course of two or three chapters of incautious meddling, setting her new friends on course for happy futures. It’s impossible to keep all of the different families straight, but it’s also not really necessary. Each story is standard Montgomery, with her signature cast of sad children, timid wallflowers, grouchy elders and fickle lovers appearing in new guises throughout. At the start of each set-piece I would make a quick guess at how the story would resolve itself and was usually correct, though not in every detail. The ones I got completely wrong were also the best stories: Lewis and the photography contest, Rebecca Dew and the cat and Anne’s visit to regal Miss Minerva, last of the Tomgallons. Incidentally, none of these tales had anything to do with romance. I suspect Montgomery simply gave her Anne readers what she knew they wanted while her heart was drawn to quite different ideas.

One of the most successful elements of this book is actually Montgomery’s whimsical sense of the macabre. Anne’s early attempt at a poetic stroll through the graveyard is hijacked by an old gossip who insists on telling her all about the rumours, mysteries and eccentricities that lie buried there (enough for an entire book of short stories) while towards the end of the book Anne is invited to dinner by Miss Minerva and hears all about the Tomgallon Curse and its victims, as she is walked through the gallery. A sample:

“Oh, yes, that was my Aunt Emilia… not my aunt really, of course. Just the wife of Uncle Alexander. She was noted for her spiritual look, but she poisoned her husband with a stew of mushrooms… toadstools really. We always pretended it was an accident, because a murder is such a messy thing to have in a family, but we all knew the truth. Of course she married him against her will. She was a gay young thing and he was far too old for her. December and May, my dear. Still, that did not really justify toadstools. She went into a decline soon afterwards. They are buried together in Charlottetown… all the Tomgallons bury in Charlottetown. This was my Aunt Louise. She drank laudanum. The doctor pumped it out and saved her, but we all felt we could never trust her again. It was really rather a relief when she died respectably of pneumonia.”

Image result for cold comfort farm book penguin]
Cold Comfort Farm, 1932.

At these moments, I can only wonder if Montgomery was actually more inclined towards the writing of gothic parodies, something in the vein of Cold Comfort Farm (which had come out only four years earlier). Anne could have made a wonderful star for such a premise. It’s a curious thought, but as it stands, Anne of Windy Poplars is best if approached as a set of short stories for those who relish Montgomery’s style – after all, there were legions of authors writing sentimental stories for teenage girls in those days, and even when less inspired, Montgomery is a cut above much of her competition.

Unfortunately, as a continuous novel about the life of Anne Shirley, Windy Poplars is fairly short on substance. To my knowledge, the Anne books do not inspire the same passionate debate on chronological vs. publication order as C.S. Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia, but I wonder if perhaps they should. Most people agree that this is one of the weakest volumes in the series and I doubt if it should actually be read fourth when it contains so little Avonlea material and such a starched and simplified interpretation of Anne herself. I shall know more upon reading Anne’s House of Dreams, which I certainly hope to find an improvement on this installment.

See Also: The earlier Anne novels, Anne of Green Gables, Anne of Avonlea and Anne of the Island.

Parental Guide, with a Pringle spoiler as well.

Violence: Aside from the lighthearted anecdotes of various Summerside skeletons in closets (including cannibalism at sea, being set on fire and a wide assortment of actual deaths) there is one fairly disturbing (and random) bit of bullying on the part of eight year old twins that Anne is supposed to be watching. Their victim is only seven.

They pounced like furies on the unfortunate Ivy, who kicked and shrieked and tried to bite but was no match for the two of them. Together they hauled her across the yard and into the woodshed, where her howls could not be heard.

Gerald held Ivy’s legs while Geraldine held her wrists with one hand and tore off her hair bow and shoulder bows and sash with the other.
“Let’s paint her legs,” shouted Gerald, his eyes falling on a couple of cans of paint left there by some workmen the previous week. “I’ll hold her and you paint her.”
Ivy shrieked vainly in despair. Her stockings were pulled down and in a few moments her legs were adorned with wide stripes of red and green paint. In the process a good deal of the paint got spattered over her embroidered dress and new boots. As a finishing touch they filled her curls with burrs.
She was a pitiful sight when they finally released her. The twins howled mirthfully as they looked at her.

Anne hardly even punishes them for this.

Values: Meddling in the private affairs of casual acquaintances is fine and will always achieve good or at least neutral results. Being positive and nice to absolutely everyone will lead to fast friendships, never mind that the Pringles only backed off of Anne’s case because she accidentally blackmailed them (they’re such nice people).

Role Models: Anne is now a sugar cube of happiness and wonder. Gilbert doesn’t get a single line of dialogue. Most everyone else is a lovable eccentric of some stripe.

Educational Properties: Little enough to speak of, with very little info on what Canadian high schoolers of this era would have been expected to learn.

End of Guide.

I will continue through the series with great interest, as we are now halfway there and Anne is about to embark on a new career as a wife and mother. Expect the next installment in January.

Up Next: Finishing off a different saga as Mark Twain tries his hand at detective fiction…